February 7, 2017
Phase-Appropriate Development and Application of Quality Systems in the Drug Development Process: The Parenteral Drug Association (PDA) recently published a revised version of Technical Report No. 56: Application of Phase-Appropriate Quality System and cGMP to the Development of Therapeutic Protein Drug Substance (API or Biological Active Substance). The FDA-harmonized guidance is welcome news to organizations involved along the drug commercialization continuum illustrated below1.
The guidance provides clarity for the industry, allowing organizations to focus on implementing phase-appropriate recommendations and requirements, depending on their current development state and the evolution of their quality system. Equally valuable, it serves as a longer term “road-map,” providing vision for planning and implementation of increasing regulatory compliance complexity as progress is made through the commercialization process.
Phase-Appropriate Development and Application of Quality Systems in the Drug Development Process (con't): For example, a R&D start-up that decides to conduct toxicology studies knows that Good Documentation Practices (GDP) and Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) are requirements prior to initiating the studies. Towards that end, they can implement GDP/GLP soon enough to support the toxicology testing phase. The same start-up can avoid headaches and costs by mistakenly implementing cGMP before they are really needed. Also note that organizations that fail to implement the minimum phase appropriate requirements run the risk of having any data generated during the R&D phase be considered suspect by regulatory reviewers, e.g., data generated using uncalibrated equipment or unqualified analytical methods could be considered to lack an appropriate level of integrity.
For those organizations on the left side of the process, the message is also clear that their development work is critical since it serves as the basis for the more stringent and complex manufacturing control strategies, CMC, process validation, method validation, and other requirements necessary to compliantly drive a product to market. The regulatory expectation is that the knowledge gained during development phases continues to grow in terms of manufacturing process understanding and control.
While large established drug developers may have the resources necessary to plug a new drug into their existing commercialization systems and mechanisms, the same cannot always be said for biotech start-ups, small research outfits, and academic research labs.
ProPharma Group possesses the experience and expertise necessary in assisting organizations to understand and implement the phase-appropriate quality system requirements along the entire continuum. Contact us to discuss how we can assist your organization make wise choices and maximize your drug development efforts.
1 Illustration imitated from PDA Technical Report No. 56: Application of Phase-Appropriate Quality System and cGMP to the Development of Therapeutic Protein Drug Substance (API or Biological Active Substance) – (Revised 2016).
Interested in learning more? Contact us today to find out how we can help with your global regulatory needs.
September 30, 2021
Pharmaceutical companies spend massive amounts of money on drug development. Regardless of a firm’s size, the investment is substantial; the smallest error can have catastrophic consequences,...
January 31, 2019
On January 16th, FDA issued a revised draft guidance outlining a number of common issues and challenges that many Sponsors face during the process of developing an orphan product. Though the...
August 20, 2015
After the FDA passed the Orphan Drug Act in 1983, the number of orphan drugs (drugs indicated for the treatment of rare diseases that affect 200,000 people or less in the United States) submitted to...