On Thursday, September 6th, the FDA released a new draft guidance regarding benefit-risk determinations in medical device premarket approval applications (PMAs), De Novo requests, and humanitarian device exemption (HDE) applications.
Uncertainty in Premarket Decisions
Medical devices are required to demonstrate a “reasonable” assurance of safety and effectiveness; an “absolute” assurance of safety and effectiveness is not required because there are typically at least some uncertainty concerning the benefits and risks of any given medical device. This uncertainty can be related to the type, magnitude, duration, or frequency of the device’s benefits or risks.
FDA considers several factors when determining the appropriate level of uncertainty for medical devices, including:
- The extent of the probable benefits of the device
- The extent of the probable risks of the device
- The extent of uncertainty regarding the benefit-risk profile of alternative treatments
- Patient perspectives on uncertainty, risks, and benefits (when available)
- The extent of the public health need
- The ability to gather extensive clinical evidence
- The ability to resolve remaining uncertainty postmarket
- Effectiveness of postmarket mitigations
- The type of decision being made (HDE application vs. PMA, etc.)
- The probable benefits of earlier patient access to the device
In the draft guidance, FDA states that it’s “consideration of these factors is intended to be pragmatic, context-dependent (considered in the context of the relevant non-clinical and/or clinical information about the device, e.g., information about the device’s mechanism of action and modes of failure), and consistent with FDA’s statutory and regulatory authorities and requirements.”
Applications & Examples
A greater level of uncertainty may be acceptable for certain types of devices, such as breakthrough devices subject to PMA and devices for small patient populations subject to PMA. Although approval still depends on the totality of valid scientific evidence, the FDA may accept greater uncertainty for devices where probable public health benefits outweigh the probable risks. This is particularly applicable when it is possible to collect additional information in a postmarket setting rather than a premarket setting.
However, according to the draft guidance, “in some cases, resolving or reducing the extent of uncertainty postmarket may not be warranted. For example, the HDE pathway accepts greater uncertainty premarket because the FD&C Act does not require a demonstration of a reasonable assurance of effectiveness; further, the FD&C Act does not require data collection on device effectiveness postmarket.”
Other examples where reducing or resolving uncertainty postmarket may not be necessary include cases where:
- Patient risk is minimal
- Postmarket data collection is not feasible
- The extent of uncertainty is small.
Are you in the process of developing a medical device application for submission to the FDA? We can help with all your medical device needs. To learn more about our medical device consulting services and how we can help you, contact us today.
