As we recently reported, the prevalence of opioid abuse and overdose have reached epidemic levels in the U.S. over the past decade. In response to this increasingly important issue, the FDA has taken and continues to take a number of steps to help reverse the impact of this widespread problem.
The Agency’s latest effort in the fight against opioid abuse came on Thursday, March 24th when the FDA issued a draft guidance entitled “General Principles for Evaluating the Abuse Deterrence of Generic Solid Oral Opioid Drug Products.” The document “recommends studies, including comparative in vitro studies, which should be conducted to demonstrate that a proposed generic solid oral opioid drug product is no less abuse-deterrent than its reference listed drug.”
Although the abuse and misuse of opioid pain medications has created a serious epidemic in the U.S., prescription opioid analgesics are still an important aspect of modern pain management. As such, developing products that have abuse-deterrent properties is critical for the FDA to ensure that safer opioids are created, which they have stated is a high public health priority. The Agency has also expressed that it is essential for generic versions of these abuse-deterrent opioids to be developed as well to help ensure the availability of analgesics for patients who need them.
In order for an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) to be approved, the sponsor must provide the FDA with sufficient information to show that the proposed product is bioequivalent to the reference listed drug (RLD), and that it has the same:
Furthermore, the sponsor must also prove “that the methods used in, or the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, processing, and packing of the drug are adequate to assure and preserve its identity, strength, quality, and purity; and that the inactive ingredients and composition of the generic drug are not unsafe for use under the conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling.”
If products are bioequivalent and meeting the following criteria, they are considered to be “therapeutically equivalent” and can be substituted for one another:
FDA states that if the RLD’s label does not describe any abuse-deterrent properties, the recommendations provided in the draft guidance are not applicable and thus irrelevant. However, if the RLD does have abuse-deterrent properties listed on its labeling, the generic product should have the same properties. When the labeling of the RLD does include abuse-deterrent properties, the sponsor should evaluate the abuse deterrence of the generic product vs. the RLD. In such situations, the FDA recommends that the comparison be conducted according to the following guidelines:
Details on the Agency’s guidelines for conducting a comparative evaluation are available in the draft guidance. The document also includes information regarding routes of abuse, provides sponsors with recommendations for conducting comparative in vitro studies, and a number of other considerations.
FDA is seeking public feedback on the draft guidance and is asking interested parties to submit comments electronically or by mail no later than May 24, 2016.