Clinical Quality Systems & the Outsourced Model

May 2, 2017

The landscape of clinical trials is evolving.  The changes that are happening are due to the increased number of FDA-regulated trials, as well as a rise in the complexity of clinical protocols.  As these protocols are becoming increasingly intricate, the need for highly functioning clinical quality systems is even more important.

Quality systems were originally a construct of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). However, regulatory authorities now expect that clinical trials are governed by efficient and practiced quality systems with respect to Good Clinical Practice (GCP).

Most Sponsors utilize services from Contract Research Organizations (CROs) to effectuate some or all of their clinical trial activity.  While delegating responsibilities to CROs may be the most efficient model for some Sponsors, the Sponsor is still responsible for ensuring the trials are being executed in a safe, accurate, and reliable manner.   The most common deficiencies noted regarding Sponsor and CRO oversight are as follows:

  • Inadequate monitoring
  • Failure to secure Investigator compliance
  • Failure to notify the FDA, Investigators, and/or Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)
  • Unqualified monitors aspect

Specifically, regulatory authorities have consistently and regularly cited Sponsors and CROs for deficiencies in the following categories concerning clinical quality systems:

  • Personnel roles and responsibilities
  • Training
  • Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
  • Quality assurance
  • Document control
  • Risk management

Clinical quality systems play a critical role in the Sponsor’s oversight and the CRO’s operations. The aforementioned deficiencies can be avoided via thoughtful planning that is prompted and required by efficient quality systems.  Clinical quality systems mitigate risk in a number of ways, including:

  • Standardizing processes and procedures
  • Ensuring adequate training on procedures
  • Defining roles and responsibilities, including escalation processes
  • Establishing vendor management plans
  • Standardizing integrated plan requirements, such as project plans, safety plans, monitoring plans, data management, etc.
  • Establishing Quality manuals
  • Defining and adhering to audit schedules and plans

When delegating tasks to a CRO, a common misconception is that the Sponsor has also delegated ultimate responsibility of the integrity and quality of the data.  This fallacy has led to many FDA observations/findings.  Sponsors should maintain a basic clinical quality system that serves as a foundation for overall strategy and management of their clinical trials.  Even with the use of a CRO, the Sponsor should have a vendor management plan that includes selection and oversight of critical service vendors.  The Sponsor is responsible for selecting an appropriate CRO with adequate clinical quality systems to manage elements under their purview, and designated in the transfer of obligations.

In the past decade, the FDA has made great efforts to emphasize the importance of quality systems in clinical trials, including the formation of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI).  The group is now comprised of several agencies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) and other industry representatives.  The core commitment and mission of the organization is to develop and implement practices that will increase the quality and efficiency of clinical trials among all stakeholders.

Although the inception of quality systems was to mitigate GMP compliance risk, clinical quality systems within the GCP framework are now the standard expectation for maintaining compliance with regard to designing, implementing, and managing clinical trials in all constructs.  While it can be perceived as an insurmountable endeavor, we are here to tell you that it can be done, and done efficiently and painlessly. ProPharma Group can help you develop and implement a successful quality system today.  For more information on analyzing your clinical quality system needs, please contact us today.

If you have any questions or thoughts on this blog post or others, please contact us today.

TAGS:

Illustration of pros and cons for Contract Research Organizations (CROs)

October 18, 2018

Pros and Cons of Working with a CRO

Sponsors may transfer any or all of their many tasks and obligations relating to clinical trials to Contract Research Organizations (CROs). This ability to delegate through a Transfer of Regulatory...

Enhancing CRO Capabilities with Independent Physician Services

The involvement of Medical Monitoring (MM) and Data Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMB) in trials has been somewhat unknown to individuals outside of clinical circles. That is, until media attention...

July 20, 2017

What Should Be on Your Clinical Trial Investigator Site Audit Checklist?

What Should Be on Your Clinical Trial Investigator Site Audit Checklist?: You live and operate in a regulated industry. Obviously, it’s crucial that you stay in compliance during your clinical...