November 18, 2024
This blog post has been updated since its original published date: April 28, 2021
A Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) is a critical component of modern pharmaceutical regulation, designed to ensure that medications with serious safety risks are used safely and effectively. Established by the FDA under the FDA Amendments Act of 2007, REMS programs provide essential information and tools to both patients and healthcare providers. By informing stakeholders about the risks associated with specific drugs, REMS programs aim to prevent misuse and enhance patient safety. The FDA can mandate a REMS at various stages of a drug's lifecycle — either pre- or post-approval — based on safety evaluations and emerging data. A REMS can be linked to a specific drug or to a drug class that shares common risk/benefit characteristics.
The implementation of REMS programs is crucial because they impact pharmaceutical companies, patients, and the entire healthcare ecosystem. Various stakeholders, including prescribers, pharmacies, and insurance providers, are influenced by these programs. REMS foster a collaborative approach to medication safety, protecting public health and maintaining healthcare integrity.
For pharmaceutical companies, REMS are essential for regulatory compliance and market access, demonstrating a commitment to patient safety and enhancing their reputation. Healthcare providers gain critical information through REMS that aids in informed decision-making and improves patient outcomes. Patients benefit from educational materials that promote safe medication use and early recognition of adverse effects. Pharmacies ensure compliance by meeting REMS requirements before dispensing medications. Insurance providers use REMS to guide coverage decisions, manage risks, and potentially lower healthcare costs. Regulatory bodies like the FDA rely on REMS to ensure that the benefits of medications outweigh their risks, safeguarding public health.
Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) outlines the criteria for when the FDA can require a REMS. These guidelines, while broad, depend on factors such as the population size, the severity of the disease, potential adverse events, and the expected benefits and duration of treatment.
A REMS can be required both pre- and post-approval. In a pre-approval scenario, the FDA may require a REMS if the drug's risks are significant compared to its benefits, allowing expedited approval for sponsors who address these concerns through a REMS. Before REMS programs, sponsors might receive a Complete Response Letter (CRL), indicating an unacceptable risk-benefit profile and a need for more data. Now, the FDA may approve the drug with an appropriate REMS bypassing prolonged regulatory delays.
Post-approval REMS can be required if new safety information emerges helping ensure ongoing drug safety as it reaches wider populations. New safety data often arise through adverse event reporting after approval, reflecting clinical use and expanded patient exposure.
The FDA evaluates several factors to determine the necessity of a REMS, including:
A REMS program must include five core components:
Document all relevant administrative details, such as applicant numbers, approval dates, and revision history to ensure transparency and maintain a clear record.
The REMS Goals section should define the primary health outcomes the REMS aims to achieve. Since risk mitigation goals are not always directly measurable, intermediate measurable objectives that signal progress. For instance, a REMS for a drug with renal toxicity might reduce renal failure risks, with measurable objectives like regular serum creatinine testing and appropriate follow-up management based on the results.
Define the responsibilities of both REMS participants and applicants. REMS participants may include stakeholders in clinical assessment, prescribing, dispensing, administering, or monitoring or distributing the drug—such as healthcare providers, patients, pharmacies, and wholesalers.
Outline the activities that participants must undertake under the REMS with Elements That Assure Safe Use (ETASU). Applicants are responsible for ensuring compliance and addressing any noncompliance. If no specific requirements apply, omit this sections from the REMS document.
Requirements should be organized into tables, with separate tables for each participant type. Include columns for the participant's role, timing of requirements, specific actions, and the materials needed for compliance.
Outline the responsibilities, typically including:
Specifies the intervals for submitting REMS assessments, ensuring regular evaluations.
If the FDA deems a REMS is necessary, the agency may require one or more REMS materials, including enrollment forms, educational resources, medication guide, patient inserts, counseling tools, and patient-provider agreements. Materials should be organized by participant relevance, with actual materials appended (except for the medication guide).
Has the FDA required you to develop a REMS program for your product? We can assist you in creating and implementing a successful REMS program that complies with FDA requirements. To learn more about our services and how we can help you achieve successful interactions with the FDA, contact us today.
FDA Guidance for Industry: Format and Content of a REMS Document
TAGS: Medical Information Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS)
June 24, 2016
On Tuesday, June 14, the “Creating and Restoring Equal Access to Equivalent Samples Act of 2016” (CREATES Act) was introduced by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. This bipartisan bill...
October 24, 2014
On September 23, FDA released a report regarding “Standardizing and Evaluating Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS)”. This fulfills FDA’s PDUFA commitment to issue a report of findings...
January 6, 2016
Last month, FDA published a draft guidance entitled, “Best Practices for Communication Between IND Sponsors and FDA During Drug Development.” The guidance was published with the intention of...